Delete search term

Header

Main navigation

Writing a literature review

The University Library supports ZHAW employees in conducting systematic reviews in the areas listed below.

A literature review provides a comprehensive overview of key theories and existing research on a specific topic. The various types of reviews differ less in their structure and more in their approach, objectives, analyses and scope. The primary goal of a literature review is to critically discuss the most relevant ideas and information within the context of the writer’s own theoretical framework.

 

Support from the University Library

We support ZHAW employees in writing literature reviews, covering the following topics:

Request support for your literature review (in German - ZHAW login required)

Structure of a literature review

A well-structured literature review is divided into the following key sections:

1. Introduction

2. Method

3. Results and discussion

4. Conclusion

Research gaps: what gaps were identified in the existing research? How could future research build on the findings to date?

Types of literature reviews

The various types of reviews differ less in their structure and more in their approach, objectives, analyses and scope. The primary goal of a literature review is to critically discuss the most relevant ideas and information within the context of the writer’s own theoretical framework.

1. Systematic review

Systematic reviews aim to identify, evaluate and summarise all relevant studies on a clearly defined research question. The objective of a systematic review is to answer a clearly formulated research question.

2. Meta-analysis

A meta-analysis is a method that summarises primary studies using quantitative and statistical methods. 

3. Scoping review

A scoping review is a specific type of literature review designed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of existing research literature on a specific topic. It is used to identify research gaps or to clarify whether a full systematic review is feasible. 

4. Mixed methods review

This type of review combines various methodological approaches, usually integrating both quantitative and qualitative research methods, in order to provide a more comprehensive picture of a research area. 

5. Rapid review

A rapid review is a time-limited but methodologically transparent review of the available evidence. It uses systematic methods but is conducted within a shorter time frame and with simplified procedures to facilitate quick decision-making.

6. Umbrella review

An umbrella review summarises the results of multiple systematic reviews on a broad topic. It is used when there are many systematic reviews available on an extensive topic in order to provide a general overview.